<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solid Article About Trademarking Web Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:26:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/comment-page-1/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>A year or two ago, under complete paranoia, when registering my first domain, I thought what if someone has this as a trademark? After all, you can be sued for 30,000 for violations. I registered the tm, and the letter was pretty draconian. I have never seen a more legal  and proper letter. For example, my mark contained the word, site. This was in the letter:
site

 
site (sÃ¬t) noun

1.    The place where a structure or group of structures was, is, or is to be located: a good site for the school.

2.    The place or setting of something: a historic site; a job site.

3.    Computer Science. A computer or network of computers associated with a unique identifying number on the Internet and electronically accessible, as through a browser.

 

verb, transitive

sitÂ·ed, sitÂ·ing, sites

To situate or locate on a site: sited the power plant by the river.


 [Middle English, from Old French, from Latin situs. See situs.][1]
When I registered it was 275.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year or two ago, under complete paranoia, when registering my first domain, I thought what if someone has this as a trademark? After all, you can be sued for 30,000 for violations. I registered the tm, and the letter was pretty draconian. I have never seen a more legal  and proper letter. For example, my mark contained the word, site. This was in the letter:<br />
site</p>
<p>site (sÃ¬t) noun</p>
<p>1.    The place where a structure or group of structures was, is, or is to be located: a good site for the school.</p>
<p>2.    The place or setting of something: a historic site; a job site.</p>
<p>3.    Computer Science. A computer or network of computers associated with a unique identifying number on the Internet and electronically accessible, as through a browser.</p>
<p>verb, transitive</p>
<p>sitÂ·ed, sitÂ·ing, sites</p>
<p>To situate or locate on a site: sited the power plant by the river.</p>
<p> [Middle English, from Old French, from Latin situs. See situs.][1]<br />
When I registered it was 275.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted r.</title>
		<link>http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>ted r.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stephen! I should make clear, that for the love of dog, please, find yourself an attorney or trademark person that can help you out. In your circle of friends there&#039;s likely someone that will be interested enough to prepare your submission for you in exchange for some web services a bottle of wine or a chance to be your attorney when you need one on a regular basis.

Each U.S. mark is  ~$365 to submit if someone can do pro bono for you. They amount may seem like a lot (it did o me when I had to submit 4 of them, but it is money well spent.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephen! I should make clear, that for the love of dog, please, find yourself an attorney or trademark person that can help you out. In your circle of friends there&#8217;s likely someone that will be interested enough to prepare your submission for you in exchange for some web services a bottle of wine or a chance to be your attorney when you need one on a regular basis.</p>
<p>Each U.S. mark is  ~$365 to submit if someone can do pro bono for you. They amount may seem like a lot (it did o me when I had to submit 4 of them, but it is money well spent.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen M. Nipper</title>
		<link>http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/comment-page-1/#comment-1971</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen M. Nipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dogster.com/2006/08/16/solid-article-about-trademarking-web-products/#comment-1971</guid>
		<description>Excellent points.  

One thing I&#039;d add is that if you do file your own trademark...there is a substantial chance you&#039;ll receive an &quot;Office Action&quot; from the Trademark Office.  Oftentimes (to a layperson) the &quot;Office Action&quot; can look like a total and complete denial of all trademark rights.  I frequently see cases where pro se trademark applicants became overwhelmed at the sight of an Action and give up.  However, no matter how draconian the Action seems...consult with a trademark attorney.  More often than not, what seems like (on its face) is a total loss can be saved through use of professional help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points.  </p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;d add is that if you do file your own trademark&#8230;there is a substantial chance you&#8217;ll receive an &#8220;Office Action&#8221; from the Trademark Office.  Oftentimes (to a layperson) the &#8220;Office Action&#8221; can look like a total and complete denial of all trademark rights.  I frequently see cases where pro se trademark applicants became overwhelmed at the sight of an Action and give up.  However, no matter how draconian the Action seems&#8230;consult with a trademark attorney.  More often than not, what seems like (on its face) is a total loss can be saved through use of professional help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
